03 March 2014

The Rebrand

As designers, we may end up having to rebrand our own business maybe once or twice if that. However, depending on the type of work we're doing, chances are we will find ourselves assisting in the rebrand of other companies. What is a rebrand you ask? Well, a rebrand is when a company, for whatever reason, be it they're failing or they feel they want a fresher look, chooses to change their look and/or public image.

As noted in this article here, there are three steps to a rebrand.  Those steps are:
  1. Reevaluate the brand--Take a look at what you have at the moment. Is your company growing with the times or is it stagnant and falling behind? Do people currently have a fairly negative view of your brand?
  2. Plan the change--What needs to change? Perhaps it's time to completely redo your website, or come up with a new, fresher logo. Come up with the plan of attack here.
  3. Follow through with the plan--Make your plans a reality. Streamline that website so that your customers can navigate, while still keeping it visually appealing. Come up with that new logo so that people have a new image come to mind (and hopefully an even better public image) when they see your logo or hear your name.
As designers, if we have the opportunity to do a rebrand, chances are we will be making use of all three of these steps. Someone will come along saying "Hey, I want to remake my company image," and you as the designer will get the ultimate joy of doing all of the work (most likely just to have them want to change the best part) with little thanks (though we do get paid, which is the point). As we work with the customer we'll take a look at what they have, make a plan, and then follow through with it. The linked site goes through the process quite well.

Lately, quite a few major companies have gone through rebrands of their own.

Walmart (2008) for example:

In Pepsi's (2008) case they've had quite a few over the years:

Then we've got Target (2006) , Starbucks (2011) , and McDonald's (2012 product wise) :

Over the course of the past 8 years there have been quite a few rebrands. Some nowhere near as successful as a few of these (go look up the Gap rebrand for an example) and some that work extremely well. With all of these, a designer had their hand in the visual update. Who knows, perhaps one of us will have a hand in the next major Starbucks update.

Sources:

http://www.smpspittsburgh.org/brand-rescue-benefits-rebrand/ (rebranding info)

http://www.finnegan.com/resources/articles/articlesdetail.aspx?news=cd8838bc-d3b0-4c91-a53e-00e690430803 (dates and further rebranding info)

http://www.imediaconnection.com/printpage/printpage.aspx?id=35147 (more dates)

https://www.logaster.com/blog/target-logo/ (Target logo update date)



6 comments:

  1. I just googled the Gap attempt to rebrand... Yikes. It looks like a 90s software company logo. Going on their website shows that they have gone back to the old very recognizable logo. Hopefully they didn't buy too many signs with the new logo on it. Rebrands are needed to keep big companies relevant, but moving to far from a highly recognizable one can be a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think rebrand is very important for companies. Styles change and in order to keep the business going companies need a new look. It makes me wonder what the next new look would be for companies in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like that there are steps to follow when doing something, especially recreating a brand or improving it. I think that it is interesting that in the examples that you showed of McDonalds, Starbucks, and Target made the simple change in their logo of removing the name of their brand. They have built up enough popularity that they no longer need to tell people what it is, they just know. Its become a universal language through symbols just like the cross walk sign or hospital sign. I feel that it would be a challenge to keep the important elements of the logo but to add or eliminate others.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a very interesting post. I like how these companies have simplified their logos/brands overtime. For the bigger companies such as Starbucks and Target, I think that they have the ability to simplify their logo as they are so well known; so that the additional content isn't necessarily needed. Thanks for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just by judging the examples above, I would agree with Esteban. It seems like the current trend. However, I think a brilliant rebrand would be one that creates a new chapter for a brand, not just a simple simplification brand update. Here are several good examples in my opinion:

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/a_spark_in_the_wrong_place.php#.Uxql7PldXEs

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_for_reebok.php#.Uxqk7vldXEs

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/from_fiji_with_love.php#.UxqmCPldXEs

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_and_identity_for_the_academy_of_motion_picture_arts_and_sciences_by_180la.php#.UxqlZPldXEs

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logo_and_identity_for_fitness_first_by_the_clearing.php#.Uxqlh_ldXEs

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love to look at rebranding timelines. Its so curious how the times and ideals of society so directly affect design especially in logos. Its interesting to compare product logos from the same genre to see if they were going for the same ideas and concepts with their logos.

    ReplyDelete